His attitude may be changing for the better. Despite my reputation as being no friend of the Jews, Bob Grant was quite cordial toward me. I was his guest during the afternoon rush hour for New York commuters, and there were many calls from listeners. At least three-quarters of the callers were favorable to my positions on race and on Jews. The few Jewish callers, of course, were intensely hostile, and their hostility made a noticeable contrast with the friendliness of the non-Jewish callers. One Jew who called in wanted to know why I blame the Jews for the bias of the news and entertainment media. It's not the Jews who should be blamed, he said, but the shareholders of the media companies: the Jewish media bosses just do what the shareholders tell them to do.
I pointed out that the top Jewish media bosses also are in many cases the dominant shareholders in the media companies, and I gave Sumner Redstone as an example. Redstone is the majority shareholder in his Viacom Corporation, which in turn owns MTV, Paramount Pictures, and CBS. I described MTV as being the most destructive of all media influences on young, White Americans. I said that MTV deliberately and consistently encourages miscegenation. I said that this racially destructive policy is Sumner Redstone's policy, not that of any anonymous shareholders, that it is a Jewish policy, and that it is the same policy as that of every other Jewish media boss. I was prepared to go on and talk about Michael Eisner and the Disney Company and ABC, and about Miramax and the Weinstein brothers, and about a lot of others, but Bob Grant disconnected that particular Jewish caller.
Then Bob Grant said to me: “I don't understand. You said that Sumner Redstone and other Jewish media bosses are deliberately trying to destroy our society. Why would they want to do that? They are rich and powerful and influential. This society has been good to them. Why would they want to destroy it?
That was a very reasonable question which almost any intelligent, honest person might ask in those circumstances: Why do the Jews want to destroy a society which has been so good to them -- especially the richest and most powerful Jews? One can imagine some embittered Jewish cab driver or office clerk wanting to strike out at Gentile society because he is resentful over the fact that he can't seem to strike it rich like the more fortunate members of his tribe, but why would those who are riding high -- billionaire Jews -- want to wreck the system from which they are profiting?
When Bob Grant asked me that question, I knew the answer, but it's not the sort of answer one wants to give to people driving home through rush-hour traffic. It is simple, but it is also profound. One needs to hear the answer and then think about it carefully for a month, turning it over in one's mind, thinking of examples and counter-examples, holding it up to the light of one's knowledge of history, before one finally says to oneself, “Yes, that is obviously why the Jews do what they do, always have, and always will.” Rush-hour traffic is not the right environment for that sort of thing.
The answer to Bob Grant's question is this: Jews do what they do because they are Jews. A more didactic answer, the one I actually gave on the Bob Grant Show, is one you probably have heard from me already if you've been listening to many of my broadcasts. Here's what I said:
Throughout their entire recorded history, the Jews have lived as a minority among other people. That's their modus vivendi: not living among themselves in a Jewish society, but living as a small, usually rich and powerful, minority in a non-Jewish society. Israel is an exception to this pattern, but Israel has existed for only 50 years out of the last 2000 years, and even today it encompasses only a small minority of the world's Jews. Most of them live in the so-called “diaspora” as a Jewish minority in a Gentile society.
When the Jews approach a healthy, homogeneous Gentile society with the aim of infiltrating it, they are looked upon as outsiders and regarded with suspicion, often with hostility if their reputation has preceded them. Facing such suspicion the Jews find it difficult to gain power or influence so that they can exploit the society. Their way of dealing with this obstacle is to undermine the solidarity of the Gentile society: destroy its homogeneity, attack its morality and traditions, encourage alienation among its young people. They do everything they can to make the society more “diverse,” multicultural, cosmopolitan, rootless, atomized. This is a slow process, continuing for several generations, but as it proceeds the society's barriers against the Jews crumble. Ultimately it allows the Jews to control and then plunder the society and suck it dry before moving on to another Gentile society to begin anew.
That's what I said on the Bob Grant Show, although I'm sure the phrasing I used was a little different. And as I said, even though my answer is simple and straightforward, it's not likely to be fully digested by someone listening to his car radio while trying to get home in rush-hour traffic. In order to be convincing, it needs to be substantiated with detailed explanation and concrete examples. What I'll do now is try to provide some of the explanation and some of the concrete facts.
First, what I said about Jews being a tribe of perpetual outsiders is a notion many people who look only at the here and now have difficulty believing. They say, “Hey! The Jews aren't outsiders. They're as integrated into the American melting pot as anyone. They are in every facet of American business and professional and cultural and political life. They own stores of every sort. They buy and sell every type of merchandise. They may not be farmers or welders or machinists or carpenters, but they are doctors and dentists and lawyers and teachers and writers and artists and musicians. They are politicians. There are a disproportionate number of Jews in the U.S. Senate and on the Supreme Court. How can you call them outsiders?”
The historical record, however, shows something quite different. It shows the Jews worming their way into one country in Europe after another, gradually monopolizing certain sectors of the economy and then using their monopoly to exploit the Gentile population, and eventually being expelled en masse when their depredations cause sufficient public unrest.
An example is England. The Jews entered England in the wake of the Norman conquest, purchased various privileges and trade monopolies from the ruling monarchs, and made themselves thoroughly unpopular. By the latter part of the 13th century the people of England had become so exasperated with the Jews that in 1290 King Edward the Great expelled all of them from his realm and forbade them ever to return. One might think that they wouldn't want to go back to a place where they had become so unpopular, but they couldn't stand the idea of all those Gentiles going unfleeced, and they never stopped scheming to get back in. It wasn't until Oliver Cromwell and his forces had overthrown the monarchy in the middle of the 17th century, however, that they were permitted to return to England.
They also were run out of virtually every other country in Europe – several times from some of them -- but they always looked for opportunities to sneak back in and return to their old depredations. They especially welcomed the upheavals and dislocations accompanying wars and revolutions because these gave them opportunities to gain footholds in places from which public hostility or the law had excluded them. During the Napoleonic Wars in the beginning of the 19th century Jews followed Napoleon's armies into many places from which they previously had been barred.
Usually they didn't have to wait for a war. Usually they would depend upon the natural tolerance of their hosts to get a toe in the door, and then they would work slowly and patiently to push that tolerance beyond its limits. They always have had an uncanny instinct for sniffing out their hosts' weaknesses and using them to break down the society's discipline and order, thereby making it possible to enlarge their toehold and gain more influence. Thus, the Jews always have had a proclivity for the liquor business, casinos and other gambling activity, prostitution, the White slave trade, pornography, and the like. It is no coincidence that for many years the Jewish Bronfman family have owned the biggest producer and distributor of liquor in North America, the Seagram Company. In Las Vegas, where gambling is intimately associated with hotels, the business is completely dominated by Jews. In the booming new business of Internet pornography, the biggest operator is Seth Warshavsky, a Jew who owns clublove.com and many other of the largest pornography sites.
And so it goes. They find their way to whatever corrupts and weakens their hosts, whatever is morally destructive, whatever makes their hosts forget their own traditions and values. They attack order and discipline: those things are old-fashioned, those things are not cool, they tell young people. They ridicule the concepts of personal honor and responsibility. They distract the people from important things and fill their minds with foolishness. They encourage every tendency which is alienating and separates people from their roots. They preach “tolerance” as the supreme virtue: tolerance of every sort of filth and perversity. And all the while they worm their way into the host society more deeply.
In America today they are in very, very deep. At the beginning of the last century signs in lobbies of New York's better hotels said: “Jews Are Not Welcome.” The better universities had quotas to limit the Jewish presence. Jews were pushy, unpleasant outsiders. But they kept on pushing, kept on breaking down the order and structure in the society that was trying in a civilized way to keep them out. And today, no less pushy and unpleasant than a century ago, they seem to have achieved insider status everywhere.
And so one might ask, as Bob Grant did, why, having become privileged insiders, are they still bent on destroying our society? Why do even the richest, most powerful Jews who have access to anything in our society they want, still work day and night to corrupt and degrade us? Why, having wormed their way in, do all of them push for increasing a flood of non-Whites into the United States from the Third World, weakening their own position? Why do they encourage our young girls to have sex with Blacks, thereby generating hatred against themselves? Having gotten so much of our wealth and power into their hands, why don't they strive to strengthen our society instead of continuing to destroy it?
Let me again give you the simplest answer, which also is the most profound answer: Jews do what they do because they are Jews.
Do you remember the old fable about the scorpion and the frog? The scorpion wants to cross a stream, but he can't swim. He sees a frog and asks the frog to carry him across on the frog's back. The frog says, "No, I don't trust you. I've heard about how treacherous scorpions are. I'm afraid that if I let you get on my back you'll sting me." The scorpion replies, "Why should I do that? That wouldn't be in my interest. If I sting you, we'll both drown."
So the frog agrees to let the scorpion get on his back and begins swimming across the stream. Halfway across, the scorpion stings the frog. As the frog is dying and beginning to sink, he asks, "Why did you do that? Now we'll both die." The scorpion answers, "I couldn't help myself. It is in my nature to sting."
And it is in the nature of the Jews to deceive and to destroy. That is what they always have done, from the days of ancient Egypt to the present, and it is what they will continue to do as long as they continue to exist as a coherent, self-conscious group. . . .
Now, there also are longer answers to the question, for those not ready to accept the profound answer. Many ethnic groups came to America from Europe and at first were considered outsiders but sooner or later became insiders, and the interests of the majority became their interests. In a sense every group that didn't come here from Great Britain began as outsiders. German mercenaries from Hessen who fought for King George and stayed here after the American Revolution quickly became insiders. The Irish, Poles and Italians went through a similar evolution. Why is it so different with the Jews?
For one thing, the non-Jewish groups never used deceit and destruction as their primary tactics for becoming insiders. These tactics were not part of their history. Their aim was to become part of the society, not to break it up so they could exploit it more easily. Every healthy ethnic or racial group has a distinct sense of group identity and a distinct self-image. The Scots and the English, for example, have distinct self-images, with their own distinct ancestral languages, their own historical traditions and customs and so on. But despite their history of conflict and hostility toward one another in Europe, either group can blend into the other and adopt the other's interests without difficulty.
The Jews are different in both degree and kind; they are much more strongly ethnocentric than any other group. Look in the Yellow Pages under the heading “associations” in any large city in America. Compare the number of Jewish associations, clubs, or organizations with those of the Irish or Germans or Poles. You must have some idea of ethnic percentages of the city's population in order to get a meaningful comparison. Go to a library and check the Encyclopedia of Associations. Jews make up just 2.5 per cent of the U.S. population, and yet you will find more Jewish associations listed than for any other ethnic or religious group. They stick together and support each other more than any other group.
The Jews also are different in kind. What is the essential element in being a Jew? It is being “chosen.” It is believing that one is a member of a tribe or race or people that has been chosen by god to inherit the earth and all that's in it. It is being superior to all who have not been chosen. If you read the Old Testament with an open mind, the message there is clear. If you want more detail, read their Talmud. They don't like for you to poke around in their Talmud, but if you are reasonably resourceful you can find a set of volumes of the Talmud and read what they think about themselves in contrast to non-Jews. If that's too much trouble for you, there are books written by race-conscious Jews themselves which spell it out for you.
The book You Gentiles, written by Jewish leader Maurice Samuel, is excellent. There are very revealing books on the doctrines and practice of Judaism by Israeli Professor Israel Shahak. And there are dozens of other books, many written by Jews, that can help you in digesting and assimilating what I told Bob Grant last week.
But most fundamentally the Jew, like the scorpion and every other creature, does what is in his nature to do. He has always lived not by settling down on a piece of turf of his own and planting his own crops and building his own house, but by breaking into someone else's house. And once in, he doesn't try to repair the damage he did by breaking in, but continues to cause more and more damage as he loots everything of value. And when there is nothing of value remaining, he finds another house to break into -- then another -- and another. That is his nature.
And, I should add, there is hardly a more important thing for any of us to do now than understand why the Jews are pushing our society over the brink of ruin, and then to oppose them by every means possible.
http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs0107b.html