go home Money Control

Does Jewish Financial Misbehavior
have anything to do with Being Jewish?

Kevin MacDonald


[Note: Jewish groups oppose Arizona-type laws–except in Israel (http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=1688)]

As expected, the fraud charges brought against Goldman Sachs by the SEC and now the Senate hearings are producing a lot of anxiety in Jewish quarters. Back in January, Michael Kinsley wrote an article telling us how to think about the Jewish angle in the financial meltdown (“How to Think About: Jewish Bankers”). The question for Kinsley isn’t whether negative qualities of Jewish bankers or the bad behavior of Jewish firms like Goldman have anything to do with being Jewish.

The question is whether anyone who criticizes Goldman is an anti-Semite:

Because Goldman is thought of as a “Jewish” firm, and because it dominates the financial industry, criticism of Goldman, or of bankers generally, is ofOten accused of being anti-Semitic. Commentators including Rush Limbaugh and Maureen Dowd have been so accused. When, if ever, are such accusations fair?”

So Kinsley passes his Geiger Counter over non-Jews like Limbaugh and Dowd and passes judgment on their moral worthiness. Any link between Jewishness and misbehavior is automatically out of bounds for serious discussion: “Certainly any explicit suggestion that Goldman’s alleged misbehavior and its Jewishness are related in any way is anti-Semitic.”

This statement draws on a general reluctance to ascribe negative traits as being reasonably associated with a certain group. But this can easily be seen to be just another example of political-correctness think. What if indeed a particular group is more likely to engage in some sort of bad behavior? For example, J. Philippe Rushton and Glayde Whitney have claimed on the basis of a rather powerful theory and a considerable amount of data that Blacks are prone to criminality and this is true wherever there are Blacks — whether in Africa, North America, South America, or the Caribbean.

If indeed that is true or at least reasonable, then it would also be reasonable to say being Black contributes to the likelihood that a certain group of Blacks are criminals — that a considerable part of the explanation for the criminality of these particular Blacks stems from their group membership. It would certainly not imply that all Blacks or even anywhere near all Blacks are criminals. Just that Blacks are more likely than other groups to be involved in certain kinds of crime — Rushton and Whitney would argue for a strong role of their common genetic ancestry.

Or take a presumably benign example: It’s well known that the Ashkenazi Jewish mean IQ higher than the European mean. If then one finds that Jews are highly overrepresented in a particular high-IQ occupation, say among mathematicians, then it is certainly reasonable to explain this as partly due to the general traits of the group, as writers ranging from Charles Murray, Henry Harpending and Greg Cochran, and I have argued

Can such an argument be made Jewish involvement in financial scandals has something to do with being Jewish? Back in the 1980s a major financial scandal revolved around Michael Milken. Much of the discussion of the Jewish role in this financial scandal centered around the book Den of Thieves by James B. Stewart. Jewish activist Alan Dershowitz called Den of Thievesan “anti-Semitic screed” and attacked a review by Michael M. Thomas in the New York Times Book Review because of his “gratuitous descriptions by religious stereotypes.” Thomas’s review contained the following passage:

James B. Stewart . . . charts the way through a virtual solar system of peculation, past planets large and small, from a metaphorical Mercury representing the penny-ante takings of Dennis B. Levine’s small fry, past the middling ($10 million in inside-trading profits) Mars of Mr. Levine himself, along the multiple rings of Saturn — Ivan F. Boesky, his confederate Martin A. Siegel of Kidder, Peabody, and Mr. Siegel’s confederate Robert Freeman of Goldman, Sachs — and finally back to great Jupiter: Michael R. Milken, the greedy billion-dollar junk-bond kingdom in which some of the nation’s greatest names in industry and finance would find themselves entrapped and corrupted.

Thomas was attacked as an anti-Semite simply for mentioning so many Jewish names all in one paragraph. His defense was to note that “If I point out that nine out of 10 people involved in street crimes are black, that’s an interesting sociological observation. If I point out that nine out of 10 people involved in securities indictments are Jewish, that is an anti-Semitic slur. I cannot sort out the difference. . . .”

I can’t sort out the difference either. And once again, the current financial meltdown has revealed a large role for Jewish companies and Jewish money managers who engineered the meltdown and profited handsomely from it.

Kinsley acknowledges that Jews predominate on Wall St. and it’s okay to criticize a Jewish firm like Goldman Sachs — but only if there is no mention that Jewishness has anything to do with it.

Sometimes the stereotype about Jews and money takes a harsher form: Jews are greedy, they lie, cheat and steal for money, they have undue influence with the government, which they cultivate and exploit ruthlessly, and so on. In recent weeks, many have said this sort of thing about Goldman Sachs, but with no reference to Jews. Are they all anti-Semites? No. It ought to be possible to criticize Goldman in the harshest possible terms–if you think that’s warranted–without being tarred as an anti-Semite.

So is it possible to frame an argument that bad behavior in the financial realm does indeed have something to do with Jewishness? Note that this is quite different from showing that Jewishness is involved in the creation of culture — the argument of The Culture of Critique. There it was only necessary to show that a movement was dominated by Jews who identified as Jews and saw their work as advancing Jewish interests.

As I see it, the argument has two parts:

1.) Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy has always had a strong element of ingroup/outgroup thinking. Entirely different moral standards are applicable inside and outside the group. The result is that the Jewish moral universe is particularistic and the attitude toward non-Jews is purely instrumental — aimed at maximizing personal benefit with no moral concerns about the consequences to non-Jews. For example, a common pattern in traditional societies was that Jews allied themselves with exploitative non-Jewish elites.

The evolutionary aspects of this situation are obvious. Jews were the ideal intermediary for any exploitative elite precisely because their interests, as a genetically segregated group, were maximally divergent from those of the exploited population. Such individuals are expected to have maximal loyalty to the rulers and minimal concerns about behaving in a purely instrumental manner, including exploitation, toward the rest of the population. (A People that Shall Dwell Alone, Ch. 5)

2.) One would then have to show that actual Jewish behavior reflected the double moral standard that is ubiquitous in Jewish religious writing. There is in fact a long history of anti-Jewish attitudes focused around the charge that Jews are misanthropes with negative personality traits who are only too willing to exploit non-Jews. This history is summarized in Ch. 2 of Separation and Its Discontents, beginning with the famous quote from Tacitus, “Among themselves they are inflexibly honest and ever ready to show compassion, though they regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies.” Among the more illustrious observers are the following (see here for the complete passage, p. 46 ff):

* Immanual Kant: Jews are “a nation of usurers . . . outwitting the people amongst whom they find shelter. . . . They make the slogan ‘let the buyer beware’ their highest principle in dealing with us.”

* Economic historian Werner Sombart: “With Jews [a Jew] will scrupulously see to it that he has just weights and a just measure; but as for his dealings with non-Jews, his conscience will be at ease even though he may obtain an unfair advantage.”

* Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz: “[The Polish Jew] took a delight in cheating and overreaching, which gave him a sort of joy of victory. But his own people he could not treat in this way: they were as knowing as he. It was the non-Jew who, to his loss, felt the consequences of the Talmudically trained mind of the Polish Jew.”

* Sociologist Max Weber: “As a pariah people, [Jews] retained the double standard of morals which is characteristic of primordial economic practice in all communities: What is prohibited in relation to one’s brothers is permitted in relation to strangers.”

* Zionist Theodor Herzl: Anti-Semitism is “an understandable reaction to Jewish defects” brought about ultimately by gentile persecution: Jews had been educated to be “leeches” who possessed “frightful financial power”; they were “a money-worshipping people incapable of understanding that a man can act out of other motives than money.”

* Edward A. Ross: “The authorities complain that the East European Hebrews feel no reverence for law as such and are willing to break any ordinance they find in their way. . . . The insurance companies scan a Jewish fire risk more closely than any other. Credit men say the Jewish merchant is often “slippery” and will “fail” in order to get rid of his debts. For lying the immigrant has a very bad reputation. In the North End of Boston “the readiness of the Jews to commit perjury has passed into a proverb.”

Edmund Connelly has reviewed the work of two academic historians, Paul Johnson (A History of the Jews) and Albert Lindemann (Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews), who “have shown that this pattern of Jewish deception and fraud in pursuit of wealth and its legitimacy within the Jewish community have a long history.”

The key point is the legitimacy of fraud within the Jewish community. Successful fraudsters are not shunned but rather become pillars of the community:

Reflecting the legitimacy of white collar crime in the wider Jewish community in the contemporary world, [Michael] Milken is a pillar of the Jewish community in Los Angeles and a major donor to Jewish causes. Indeed, this is part of a pattern: Ivan Boesky donated $20 million to the library at the Jewish Theological Seminary. And the notorious Marc Rich has donated millions of dollars to a wide range of Jewish causes, including Birthright Israel, a program designed to increase Jewish identification among young Jews. The list of people supporting Rich’s pardon by Bill Clinton was “a virtual Who’s Who of Israeli society and Jewish philanthropy.” A rabbi concerned about the ethics of these practices notes, “it is a rare Jewish organization that thinks carefully about the source of a donor’s money. … The dangerous thing is not that people make moral mistakes, but that we don’t talk about it.”

The idea is that the Jewish financial elite sees the non-Jewish world in instrumental terms — as objects with no moral value. As I noted earlier,

there is a strong suggestion that the financial elite behaved much more like an organized crime syndicate than as an elite with a sense of civic responsibility or commitment to the long term viability of the society. Whereas organized crime stems from the lower levels of society, this meltdown was accomplished at the very pinnacle of society — the Ivy League grads …, the wealthy financial firms and investment rating agencies, the strong connections with government that facilitated the bailout and failed to provide scrutiny while it was happening. It seems highly doubtful that all this would have happened with the former WASP elite.

In psychological terms, these Jews are behaving in a sociopathic manner toward the non-Jewish world. That is, they have no concern for the moral consequences of their actions — no empathy or concern for victims. Recent neuroscience data shows that people are quite capable of having a great deal of empathy and concern for people in their ingroup while having no empathy at all toward outsiders, especially if they are highly ethnocentric. This implies that a strongly identified Jew could be the epitome of a well-socialized, empathic group member when he is among Jews, but treat the rest of the world in a cold and calculating manner and have no remorse or empathy for the victims.

Nor would such a person have any concerns about the long-term future of the society he lives in. Richard Spencer discusses the fact that so many of our politicians are sociopaths (my favorite example is Winston Churchill), noting that “Aristocrats governed with a healthy, long-term goal in mind: they wanted their great grandchildren to inherit a prosperous, powerful realm.”

It can safely be asserted that concerns about the long-term health of the society are not uppermost in the minds of our financial elite.

Concerns that Wall Street is socially irresponsible are widespread now. Just last week I saw CNBC reporter David Faber asking Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs whether Wall Street was good for America. Is it serving any positive social function? — with the implication that it’s at least reasonable to think it isn’t. Such a question would have been inconceivable a couple years ago. Rather than producing any tangible goods or allocating financing in a way that benefits good businesses, Matt Taibbi’s analogy seems to hit home: “The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”

As Kinsley notes, this analogy was immediately deemed anti-Semitic by the usual thought police: “This sentence, many have charged, goes beyond stereotypes about Jews and money, touches other classic anti-Semitic themes about Jews as foreign or inhuman elements poisoning humanity and society, and—to some critics—even seems to reference the notorious ‘blood libel’ that Jews use the blood of Christian babies to make matzoh.”

It also conjures up a strong image of economic parasitism, another ancient anti-Jewish theme: the financial sector as not producing products or wealth, but extracting wealth to the detriment of the society as a whole.

The problem for Kinsley and like-minded people is trying to seriously rebut the claim that the socially destructive behavior of the predominantly Jewish financial elite does in fact fit a strong historic pattern of Jewish ethical behavior vis á vis the non-Jewish society — behavior that is well grounded in Jewish religious ethics.

In any case, it is a very troubling sign indeed for the US that the financial sector is vastly outpacing the rest of the economy in corporate earnings as well as in executive compensation — especially when it’s being run by a group of people who have sociopathic attitudes toward non-Jewish America.

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 2nd, 2010 at 6:29 PM and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

10 Responses to “Kevin MacDonald: Does Jewish financial misbehavior have anything to do with being Jewish?”

1. AmusedEuro says: May 2, 2010 at 7:29 PM
When an affirmative action black lady cries “racism” because she was reprimanded for being late for work, at best, people smile and nod politely. Why would anyone take these Jews – criminals caught red handed stealing money and scamming people – seriously when they cry “anti-semite” when someone notices their crimes? It’s a joke.
I’m sure Bernie Madoff is crying “anti-semite” in prison. Who cares?

2. Aaron says: May 2, 2010 at 8:07 PM
Here are some things that would have improved the argument.
1. There was no comparison of Jews in the financial sector to non-Jews in similar positions in the financial sector. Analogously, I’m sure blacks commit almost all of the NBA basketball fouls, but the right thing to compare is the foul rate among black NBA players with the foul rate among white NBA players.
2. Using phrases like “purely instrumental” belies the implicit claim to rational analysis of the article. It’s just propaganda. Besides being wrong (hardly anything is “pure”), the article could make the point as well or better without this kind of hyperbole.
3. Where’s the evidence that these Jewish Wall Street types preyed specifically on non-Jews? I’m not saying they didn’t, only that it would have been nice to see some evidence. Bernie Madoff famously preyed almost exclusively on Jewish investors.
Common sense tells me that there is a connection between being Jewish and committing this kind of crime, but this article doesn’t take things much beyond a statement of common sense.

3. chubby says: May 2, 2010 at 8:37 PM
You claim the WASPs would never have committed such crimes. Perhaps. Then again, they had no problem importing a million or so Africans whom they knew would unassimilable and would cause their progeny no end of problems. They just did not care, because they were too interested in solving their short term problems not about what might happen in a hundred years or so. They were selfish and short-sighted in the extreme. We would not be in as perilous a position now had they a little (and I do mean just a little) more foresight and concern. If Whites survive we must base our future government on an explicitly racial basis.

4. Finrod says: May 2, 2010 at 8:42 PM
Here is just some further data on this point. A show called “American Greed” on CNBC or one of those channels the other night reviewed the case of Shalom Weiss, who with the help of a New York law firm, would loot insurance companies, eventually stealing to the tune of 200 million. It had been one of the largest fraud cases before Madoff. Shalom Weiss was ostensibly a devout, orthodox Jew who would always sport a Yarmulke. I was struck how Jewish the whole affair was, although naturally the show didn’t comment on this detail. All the fraudsters were Jewish and all their defense lawyers were Jewish. Weiss fled after his conviction, but was eventually captured through use of a little deception. The pique of his defense lawyer on this point was comical.
@Aaron: There is an article in the archives on this site arguing that Jews did not primarily lose money in the Madoff scandal, that this was just a media spin job.

5. Charles Martel says: May 2, 2010 at 9:21 PM
I’m glad that you raise the issue of extraction of wealth vs wealth creation through productive economic activity. This is a notion taken from classical economics that has been purged from most economics classes by Milton Friedman & the Chicago school. Former chief balance-of-payments economist for Citigroup, Michael Hudson, makes this a regular issue in his interviews and in his writings. I encourage those who are curious about this topic to check out the links I have embedded above.

6. OR says: May 2, 2010 at 9:56 PM
As I read that last phrase, ” … especially when it’s being run by a group of people who have sociopathic attitudes toward non-Jewish America.”, the first thing that came to mind was James H. Kunstler and his snarky references to “corn pone nazis”. Kunstler looks down from high on the mass of Americans as superfluities who no longer serve any instrumental purpose.

7. Tweets that mention Kevin MacDonald: Does Jewish financial misbehavior have anything to do with being Jewish? « The Occidental Observer Blog -- Topsy.com says: May 2, 2010 at 10:37 PM [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by 911= Zionistjob. 911= Zionistjob said: Kevin MacDonald: Does Jewish financial misbehavior have anything to do with being Jewish?:

8. Harumphty_Dumpty says: May 2, 2010 at 10:47 PM
“Michael Kinsley wrote …’How to Think About: Jewish Bankers’” Titles like that seem to crack the facade slightly just in themselves. How many articles can be published on “Why the Emperor has no clothes” before people see the naked truth?

9. Focus Ring says: May 3, 2010 at 12:40 AM
Charles Martel, thanks for the links.
Finrod, you may be interested in a story a friend of mine who’s a news cameraman told me. He isn’t really “into” the whole “jewish thing” yet, but he did say the jews outside the courthouse when Madoff was on trial, sentenced and so on were staged. He said the whole thing was like a stage play, with news producers arranging where they would stand, react. He said it actually scared him. These outraged victims were motored in day after day to be ready for their performances. By the way, my friend covers the stories he does because the jews think he’s a jew. He could pass as one and they assume his name, which is Irish, is some kind of swiped E. European name because of the spelling. This ties in with the observations and investigations that show jews didn’t really lose much of anything in the Madoff affair.

10. apollonian says: May 3, 2010 at 7:29 AM
Facts Of Jew Behavior Confirm Perfectly Talmudic Hatred And War Against Humanity, Reason, Truth, Etc.
(Apollonian, 3 May 10)

Prof. MacDonald does more excellent work, once again simply defending, demonstrating, and exerting science and INDUCTIVE LOGIC. Thus our good Prof. applies his trusty logic and keen observations to specific subject of Jew financial behavior and dealings as we are privileged to see in his excellent article.
Thus detail, after detail, after fact, after fact, with no dis-confirming facts or details, THEN LEADS TO INDUCTIVE CONCLUSION–which now must be DIS-PROVEN for the conclusion not to be accepted as actual truth of reality. Or as Sherlock Holmes put it, “once u’ve eliminated the impossible, the remainder, no matter how unlikely, is necessary solution.”

Such again, is the very scientific (Inductive) method demonstrated by Prof. Mac, who well confirms his fame. U. of Cal is lucky to have such exemplary scientist. Thus do lucky students learn fm such master–but Jews don’t like this–for a very understandable reason.
So the facts and details all lead to INDUCTION (generalization) that Jews are simply an extended criminal gang/family–which all history of humankind CONFIRMS. Christ himself said of Jews: “ye are liars, sons of ur father, Satan, father of lies….” (Gosp. JOHN 8:44.)

So now what do Jews say and tell us, and scream, as they jump up and down?
Jews tell us that science and INDUCTIVE LOGIC (and conclusion) cannot be accepted on grounds of MORALISM- PHARISAISM. Thus we CANNOT and are NOT allowed to hold to any conclusion if it is un-favorable to Jews–as golly gee, it would be “anti-semitic.”

As Immanuel Kant would have it, thus “moralism” TRUMPS truth and reality (or at least inductive logic, eh?). And golly gee, but do u see how such Jew-friendly “moralism” (anti-antisemitism) ALWAYS FAVORS Jews?–Sure is clever of these Jews, isn’t it?–they’re sooooooo “intelligent,” aren’t they?–they’re certainly quite clever, regardless, like any criminals, for sure–too clever, by half.

Observe further: in PRECISELY same inductive manner, ALL EVIDENCE (see Bollyn.com) for 9-11 leads to INDUCTIVE conlusion Jews and Israeli MOSSAD perpetrated 9-11 mass-murder and continuing cover-up by political means and the Jew-controlled mass-corporate “Jews-media” (see http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/index.html).

But again, Jews tell us all we can’t so hold Jews responsible (for 9-11) becasue, golly gee, that would be “anti-semitic.”
So note then: INDUCTIVE LOGIC and all human reason are now “anti-semitic.” Thus “Decline of the West,” by Oswald Spengler is confirmed–but after awhile, it’s reduced-to-absurd, isn’t it?–for now it’s matter of survival of gentile people. Wake-up, people.

So be it, I say. For Christians uphold TRUTH above all, co-equal w. Christ himself (Gosp. JOHN 14:6). Any proper “morality,” which is mere logic btwn ends and means, MUST BE SUBORDINATE TO TRUTH and reality.

CONCLUSION: Comrades: we need JEW-EXPULSION; it’s long past time. And don’t forget Jews ARE NOT “white”–any more than are mestizos and mulattos. Jews ARE ENEMIES of white folk–and all humanity, don’t doubt. And and don’t forget FACTS of Jew behavior all correspond PERFECTLY with THEORY of Talmudic ritual murder (see RevisionistHistory.org and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo). Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Aaron says: May 2, 2010 at 8:07 PM
Here are some things that would have improved the argument.

1. There was no comparison of Jews in the financial sector to non-Jews in similar positions in the financial sector. Analogously, I’m sure blacks commit almost all of the NBA basketball fouls, but the right thing to compare is the foul rate among black NBA players with the foul rate among white NBA players.
2. Using phrases like “purely instrumental” belies the implicit claim to rational analysis of the article. It’s just propaganda. Besides being wrong (hardly anything is “pure”), the article could make the point as well or better without this kind of hyperbole.
3. Where’s the evidence that these Jewish Wall Street types preyed specifically on non-Jews? I’m not saying they didn’t, only that it would have been nice to see some evidence. Bernie Madoff famously preyed almost exclusively on Jewish investors.
Common sense tells me that there is a connection between being Jewish and committing this kind of crime, but this article doesn’t take things much beyond a statement of common sense.

# chubby says: May 2, 2010 at 8:37 PM
You claim the WASPs would never have committed such crimes. Perhaps. Then again, they had no problem importing a million or so Africans whom they knew would unassimilable and would cause their progeny no end of problems. They just did not care, because they were too interested in solving their short term problems not about what might happen in a hundred years or so. They were selfish and short-sighted in the extreme. We would not be in as perilous a position now had they a little (and I do mean just a little) more foresight and concern. If Whites survive we must base our future government on an explicitly racial basis.

Charles Martel says: May 2, 2010 at 9:21 PM
I’m glad that you raise the issue of extraction of wealth vs wealth creation through productive economic activity. This is a notion taken from classical economics that has been purged from most economics classes by Milton Friedman & the Chicago school.
Former chief balance-of-payments economist for Citigroup, Michael Hudson, makes this a regular issue in his interviews and in his writings. I encourage those who are curious about this topic to check out the links I have embedded above.

# Harumphty_Dumpty says: May 2, 2010 at 10:47 PM
“Michael Kinsley wrote an article…’How to Think About: Jewish Bankers’”
Titles like that seem to crack the facade slightly just in themselves. How many articles can be published on “Why the Emperor doesn’t not have any clothes” before people see the naked truth?

# apollonian says: May 3, 2010 at 7:29 AM
Facts Of Jew Behavior Confirm Perfectly Talmudic Hatred And War Against Humanity, Reason, Truth, Etc.
(Apollonian, 3 May 10)

Prof. MacDonald does more excellent work, once again simply defending, demonstrating, and exerting science and INDUCTIVE LOGIC. Thus our good Prof. applies his trusty logic and keen observations to specific subject of Jew financial behavior and dealings as we are privileged to see in his excellent article.
Thus detail, after detail, after fact, after fact, with no dis-confirming facts or details, THEN LEADS TO INDUCTIVE CONCLUSION-which now must be DIS-PROVEN for the conclusion not to be accepted as actual truth of reality. Or as Sherlock Holmes put it, “once u’ve eliminated the impossible, the remainder, no matter how unlikely, is necessary solution.”
Such again, is the very scientific (Inductive) method demonstrated by Prof. Mac, who well confirms his fame. U. of Cal is lucky to have such exemplary scientist. Thus do lucky students learn fm such master-but Jews don’t like this-for a very understandable reason.
So the facts and details all lead to INDUCTION (generalization) that Jews are simply an extended criminal gang/family-which all history of humankind CONFIRMS. Christ himself said of Jews: “ye are liars, sons of ur father, Satan, father of lies….” (Gosp. JOHN 8:44.)
So now what do Jews say and tell us, and scream, as they jump up and down?
Jews tell us that science and INDUCTIVE LOGIC (and conclusion) cannot be accepted on grounds of MORALISM-PHARISAISM. Thus we CANNOT and are NOT allowed to hold to any conclusion if it is un-favorable to Jews-as golly gee, it would be “anti-semitic.”
As Immanuel Kant would have it, thus “moralism” TRUMPS truth and reality (or at least inductive logic, eh?). And golly gee, but do u see how such Jew-friendly “moralism” (anti-antisemitism) ALWAYS FAVORS Jews?-Sure is clever of these Jews, isn’t it?-they’re sooooooo “intelligent,” aren’t they?-they’re certainly quite clever, regardless, like any criminals, for sure-too clever, by half.
Observe further: in PRECISELY same inductive manner, ALL EVIDENCE (see Bollyn.com) for 9-11 leads to INDUCTIVE conlusion Jews and Israeli MOSSAD perpetrated 9-11 mass-murder and continuing cover-up by political means and the Jew-controlled mass-corporate “Jews-media” (see http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/index.html).
But again, Jews tell us all we can’t so hold Jews responsible (for 9-11) becasue, golly gee, that would be “anti-semitic.”
So note then: INDUCTIVE LOGIC and all human reason are now “anti-semitic.” Thus “Decline of the West,” by Oswald Spengler is confirmed-but after awhile, it’s reduced-to-absurd, isn’t it?-for now it’s matter of survival of gentile people. Wake-up, people.
So be it, I say. For Christians uphold TRUTH above all, co-equal w. Christ himself (Gosp. JOHN 14:6). Any proper “morality,” which is mere logic btwn ends and means, MUST BE SUBORDINATE TO TRUTH and reality.
CONCLUSION: Comrades: we need JEW-EXPULSION; it’s long past time. And don’t forget Jews ARE NOT “white”-any more than are mestizos and mulattos. Jews ARE ENEMIES of white folk-and all humanity, don’t doubt. And and don’t forget FACTS of Jew behavior all correspond PERFECTLY with THEORY of Talmudic ritual murder (see RevisionistHistory.org and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo). Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

# apollonian says: May 3, 2010 at 8:08 AM
[Apollonian commentary in below-copied text, capped, bracketed. A.]

* * * * *
chubby says: “You claim the WASPs would never have committed such crimes. [OBVIOUSLY FALSE.]

“Perhaps. Then again, they had no problem importing a million or so Africans
[THIS SLAVE BUSINESS WAS LITERALLY MONOPOLIZED BY JEWS AS NUMEROUS SOURCES CONFIRM. AMONG EUROPEANS IT WAS ONLY VERY, VERY FEW BUSINESS PEOPLE WHO TOOK PART IN SUCH SLAVERY. NOTE FURTHER, IT WAS BLACKS WHO ORIGINALLY TOOK OTHER BLACKS AS SLAVES, THEN SOLD THEM TO VARIOUS PEOPLE, LIKE ARABS. WHITES WERE LATE-COMERS TO AFRICAN SLAVE BUSINESS.]

“…whom they knew would unassimilable and would cause their progeny no end of problems. They just did not care, because they were too interested in solving their short term problems not about what might happen in a hundred years or so. They were selfish
[ALL PEOPLE ARE SELFISH, AS BEING CREATURES OF WILL, ONE IS NATURALLY "SELFISH" AND SELF- INTERESTED BY DEFINITION AND NATURE--IT'S WHY CHRISTIANS HOLD HUMANS ARE "SINFUL" BY NATURE.]

“…and short-sighted in the extreme. We would not be in as perilous a position now had they a little (and I do mean just a little) more foresight and concern. If Whites survive we must base our future government on an explicitly racial basis.”
[I SAY WE WHITES SHOULD FOUND OUR SOCIETY AND ACTIVITY IN ACCORD W. REASON AND LOGIC--HENCE WE SHOULD REMOVE AND EXPEL JEWS AND OTHER PSYCHOPATHS AND CRIMINALS.]

# admin says: May 3, 2010 at 8:12 AM
Re Bantam: The issue is the sheer percentages of these crimes perpetrated by Jews and their legitimacy within the Jewish community. As Thomas says, “If I point out that nine out of 10 people involved in street crimes are black, that’s an interesting sociological observation. If I point out that nine out of 10 people involved in securities indictments are Jewish, that is an anti-Semitic slur. I cannot sort out the difference. . . .” We have to explain that.

# apollonian says: May 3, 2010 at 8:28 AM
[Apollonian commentary in below-copied text, capped, bracketed. A.]

* * * * *
Aaron says: May 2, 2010 at 8:07 PM
“Here are some things that would have improved the argument.
[THIS IS MERELYOUR OPINION, AND U GIVE NO CRITERION. NOTE THE ARGUMENT MUST BE REASONABLY BRIEF ENOUGH TO BE READABLE, AT SAME TIME IT MUST CONTAIN ENOUGH FACTS TO SUPPORT THESIS AND CONCLUSION. I GIVE PROF. MACDONALD AN "A," AS HE SUPPORTS HIS CONTENTION QUITE WELL. NOTE THERE'S STRICT SCIENCE, WHICH WAS EXCELLENT, AND THEN THERE'S THE ART OF EXPO, WHICH WAS ALSO OUTSTANDING. PROF. MAC WELL-EARNED HIS PAY--AND THEN SOME.]

“1. There was no comparison of Jews in the financial sector to non-Jews in similar positions in the financial sector.
[PROBLEM IS JEWS ABSOLUTELY DOMINATE FINANCE--IT SIMPLY ISN'T POSSIBLE TO COMPARE. ALL THE GENTILES ARE IN SUBORDINATE POSITIONS TO JEWS, HENCE NECESSARILY GO ALONG, FOLLOWING ORDERS. USA IS A CORPORATE-FASCIST DICTATORSHIP W. JEWS IN COMMAND POSITIONS, NEVER FORGET. OBSERVE THE VERY FUNDAMENTAL FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT IS COUNTERFEIT SCAM KNOWN AS FEDERAL RESERVE BANK--SEE RealityZone.com AND TheMoneyMasters.com. FOR EXPO/REF. ON FED FRAUD.]

“Analogously, I’m sure blacks commit almost all of the NBA basketball fouls, but the right thing to compare is the foul rate among black NBA players with the foul rate among white NBA players.
“2. Using phrases like “purely instrumental” belies the implicit claim to rational analysis of the article. It’s just propaganda. Besides being wrong (hardly anything is “pure”), the article could make the point as well or better without this kind of hyperbole.
“3. Where’s the evidence that these Jewish Wall Street types preyed specifically on non-Jews?
[PROF. DOESN'T NECESSARILY MAKE THIS CLAIM. WELL-KNOWN FACT IS TOP JEWS ROUTINELY VICTIMIZE LOWER-LEVEL JEWS WHEN NEED ARISES--AND LOWER-LEVEL JEWS WILLINGLY ALLOW THIS, MAKING EXCUSES FOR THEIR BEING VICTIMIZED AS LONG AS GENTILES ARE VICTIMIZED MORE.]

“I’m not saying they didn’t, only that it would have been nice to see some evidence.
[U HAVE PLENTY OF EVIDENCE FOR JEW CRIMINALITY--ALL HISTORY IS EVIDENCE. TALMUD ITSELF IS THE MASTER-PLAN OF WARFARE AGAINST GENTILES WHICH JEWS FOLLOW AS THEY ALWAYS HAVE, JEWS BEING JEWS (TALMUDISTS).]

Bernie Madoff famously preyed almost exclusively on Jewish investors.
[RIGHT, BUT THIS DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING, AND IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT. AGAIN, TOP-LEVEL JEWS NOTORIOUSLY PREY UPON LOWER-LEVEL JEWS WHENEVER NECESSARY. PARASITES EVENTUALLY KILL THE HOST; THEN PARASITES MUST KILL EACH OTHER. SUCH IS THE CYCLIC NATURE OF BIOLOGY, SOCIOLOGY, AND HISTORY, ACCORDING TO OSWALD SPENGLER IN "DECLINE OF THE WEST."]

“Common sense
[YES, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS INDUCTIVE LOGIC]

“…tells me that there is a connection between being Jewish [TALMUDIC PSYCHOPATHS AND MURDERERS]

“…and committing this kind of crime, [TALMUD IS LITERALLY WAR-PLAN AGAINST GENTILE HUMANITY.]

“…but this article doesn’t take things much beyond a statement of common sense.”
[SO WHAT? THE THESIS WAS PROVEN, JEWS WORKING TO BENEFIT JEWS AGAINST NON-JEWS. THERE ARE INDEED OTHER NOTES TO BE MADE (AS I MADE, ABOVE), BUT THE ARTICLE WELL DEMONSTRATED THESIS NONETHELESS. PROF. DESERVES AN "A," AND U DESERVE MERE "C-," I SAY.]

# Chris Moore says: May 3, 2010 at 8:37 AM
I have found that the Jewish Zionists (and many other elements in organized Jewry e.g. the Postville Jews) seek to hid behind all Jews in order to excuse or obscure their own criminal behavior.

They operate as merely a more sophisticated and elaborate form of the Crips and the Bloods, and their shouts of “anti-Semitism” are akin to black gang-bangers running a crack house shouting “racism” as they’re put into the back of a police car.

The difference is that the corrupt, post-Christian establishment (Right and Left) acquiesces to Jewry because it is in bed with them on so many levels, from politics to Zionism to financial shenanigans, whereas the Crips and Bloods are treated like pariahs because they are street criminals with little political or economic power.

So America will eventually either have to mainstream and legalize the criminalism of the Crips and Bloods, or outlaw the criminal Jews. Given the insanity of our rulers, we all know which way they’re planning to go, don’t we? (Hint: mass amnesty, anyone?)

# Finrod says: May 3, 2010 at 8:44 AM
@Bantam: Sure there are fraudsters from all groups, dating back to the earliest days of Wall Street. The actual Ponzi was not himself Jewish. I don’t believe that Jews have any genetic predisposition to financial crimes, any greater than any other subgroup, but there is something about Jewish moral particularism that makes it so much more dangerous. When gentiles are crooks, they are isolated cases which are condemned by society at large. However, if crooks are condoned or actually supported by their ingroup, then this makes for more damaging extended crime networks, ultimately these fraud leviathans such as Madoff and possibly Goldman-Sachs, that have been cropping up in recent years.

@ Focus: That’s an interesting anecdote. Are you the same guy who used to work in visual effects in the film industry?

# apollonian says: May 3, 2010 at 9:11 AM
“The difference is that the corrupt, post-Christian establishment (Right and Left) acquiesces to Jewry because it is in bed with them on so many levels, from politics to Zionism to financial shenanigans, whereas the Crips and Bloods are treated like pariahs because they are street criminals with little political or economic power.” -Chris Moore says: May 3, 2010 at 8:37 AM

* * * * *
Criminal Hold Over USA Is “All In The Mind,” Literally
(Apollonian, 3 May 10)

“Chris”: once again, u hit nail on proverbial “head.” Observe that over-whelming, absolutely INVINCIBLE Fed COUNTERFEIT scam/mechanism/operation LITERALLY buys the very souls of practically everyone, anyone not co-operating is assassinated.
That’s why present politicians will vote for “amnesty” for illegal alien invaders-EVEN WHEN THEY KNOW PEOPLE ARE AGAINST IT by incredible margins of up to 80%, even more-they’re simply bribed by infinite funds which are simply COUNTERFEITED (printed) up, literally, and they know if they DON’T go along, they will be dis-elected or out-rightly killed.

Thus Jews (and accomplices) literally CONTROL every single establishment Christian church without exception; they lobotomize the youth in public-”education,” and then continue the programming/indoctrination of entire culture/society by means of “Jews-media.” Thanks goodness for mighty internet and bloggers like Prof. MacDonald.

IT’S FOOL-PROOF-until the ZOG-Mammon empire-of-lies system has to CYCLICALLY collapse due to over-use of COUNTERFEIT racket, as we see, US Dollar about to collapse-but still, look how brilliantly it cooked along for almost 100 years.
People need to snap out of this prison of ABSTRACTIONS dis-connected fm CONCRETE reality by which they can’t see through this HUGE, incredible “BIG-LIE” of Fed fraud.

CONCLUSION: Similarly, folks, esp. moronic “Judeo-Christian” (JC-see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for expo/ref.) hereticalists, KEY to Judeo-conspiracy presently holding entire nation in thrall, need to face-up to simple fact dear Christianity is SUPPOSED to be ANTI-SEMITIC (anti-Talmud, as Gosp.s MARK 7:1-3 and MATT 15:3-9). Christ was NOT “Jew” (Talmudist), and if u’re NOT anti-semitic, u aren’t and can’t be Christian, pilgrim. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

# Geiseric says: May 3, 2010 at 2:16 PM
The question is if the fraud issue extends into science. Are Jewish scientists/scholars genuinely seeking “truth” or is there another, parallel, name of the game?

# apollonian says: May 3, 2010 at 5:46 PM
“What says KM: does Wall Street serve “any positive social function”? Traditional Catholicism, Islam and German NS were all opposed to usury/interest/riba and financial speculation. Is there a sociobiological reason for that?” -HA says: May 3 at 1:06 PM

* * * * *
Note “Usury” Is Notorious Buzz-Word Requiring Careful Definition
(Apollonian, 3 May 10)

“HA”: note it’s mere matter of careful DEFINITION OF TERMS. Note then “usury” is gross buzz-word used for several DIFFERENT things-and which Jews have great fun with confused gentiles, Jews most consummate frauds, liars, and cheats, in accord w. their infernal, Satanic Talmud which urges war and fraud against gentiles.

(a) Charging of interest is strict matter of CONTRACT which should be right of citizens on individual basis. If someone is willing to pay a “high” rate of interest in order to acquire capital, that’s his right-it’s strictly private matter btwn parties.

(b) But “usury” is also and properly used in pejorative sense in reference to what’s now called “fractional-reserve money and banking,” also “central banking” (see RealityZone.com and TheMoneyMasters.com for expo/ref.), whereby tokens or receipts of (PAPER) “money” are lent out, the backing gold or silver (or whatever commodity) kept in reserve being static relative to evermore replicated (COUNTERFEITED) receipts/tokens being lent, these then replicated FAR IN EXCESS of what is actually kept (in gold or silver, etc.) in “reserve” on hand, as presently.

Ron Paul (CampaignForLiberty.com), Tom Woods, Lew Rockwell (LewRockwell.com), and the “Austrian School” (Mises.com) of economics all give detailed expo and history on these items and terms. “Central banking” has been curse of West since French Revolution and rise of Rothschild bankers ever since. Jews were allowed back into England by Oliver Cromwell in mid-17th cent. and Bank of England was established in 1696.

CONCLUSION: All reputable, rational culture, Christian, Islamic, etc., but NOT Jew, makes FRAUD illegal-and this fraud is precisely what is present US Federal Reserve Bank (Fed), a crass, putrid COUNTERFEITING scam (”central banking,” again)-but note again, charging of interest is entirely SEPARATE issue. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

# Daybreaker says: May 3, 2010 at 6:14 PM
Aaron says: “2. Using phrases like “purely instrumental” belies the implicit claim to rational analysis of the article.”
I agree that “purely” was a mistake. It invites nit-picking and adds nothing.

# Daybreaker says: May 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM
admin says: “Re Bantam: The issue is the sheer percentages of these crimes perpetrated by Jews and their legitimacy within the Jewish community. [...] We have to explain that.”

I think part of the explanation is in-group charity, with Jews traditionally not being part of gentile charitable networks, e.g. the Catholic Church wasn’t providing Jewish funeral rites. It doesn’t take much money for wealthy Jews to render themselves morally bulletproof, and there’s nothing cynical about that. Wealthy Jews consider consolidating the identity of poorer Jews and taking account of their needs a worthy use of their money. For many Jews feeling a bit estranged from the world of the “exile” and aware of where charity for people like them comes from, it would take a remarkable lack of ethnocentrism for them not to want the business ethics of big providers to be off the table and of no interest. Jews are not noted for any remarkable lack of ethnocentrism

# Zeitgeist says: May 3, 2010 at 8:54 PM
The Jews are our undoing. They must be stopped.

NPR radio report on the Atlantic story Dr MacDonald referenced - http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126310251 - “Is Criticism Of Goldman Really Anti-Semitism?”

# Zeitgeist says: May 3, 2010 at 9:07 PM
And did anyone else notice that Obama just nominated 3 more Jews to the Federal Reserve even though the FED is already stacked and stuffed with Jews?

- http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/29/business/29fed.html

Obama just nominated Janet Yellen (Jewish), Peter A. Diamond (Jewish), and Sarah Bloom Raskin (Jewish) — this despite the fact that the FED is already disproportionately Jewish by an astronomical margin.
If you didn’t know better you’d think 90% of America’s population is Jewish judging from their gross over-representation in the highest echelons of American banking, business, mass-media, academia, etc.

# Zeitgeist says: May 3, 2010 at 9:17 PM
Finrod:”I don’t believe that Jews have any genetic predisposition to financial crimes, any greater than any other subgroup…”

READ: “Steinweis surveys German studies that implicated Jews in economic crimes and crimes against morality (Sittlichkeitsver-brechern). Ironically, as Steinweis notes (p. 138), it was a Jew, the Italian crim-inologist Caesare Lombroso, who invented the concept of the “born criminal.” J. Keller and Hanns Andersen used Lombroso’s idea in their book The Jew as Crim-inal, in which Jews were described as “born to crime” and possessing a special pre-disposition to and ability for fraud, dirty dealing, dishonest gambling, usury, sexual transgressions of all kinds, pick pocketing, and treason. As Steinweis points out, neither of the authors had academic credentials of any sort, nor were they associated with any university. However, Johann von Leers, a trained jurist holding a professor-ship in history at Jena University, did publish a booklet, The Crimin-ality of the Jews, in which he presented statistics showing a disproportionately high Jewish participation in white-collar crime. Jews were 12 times more likely than non-Jews to be involved in usury; 11 times more likely to engage in the theft of intellectual property; 8-9 times as likely to declare fraudulent bankruptcy. Between 1903 and 1936, Leers noted, the frequency of Jewish participation in usury was 29 times that of non-Jews.” - http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Michaels-Steinweis.html

# Junghans says: May 3, 2010 at 10:21 PM
I found the Steinweis book about Third Reich Era German racial science to be exceptionally objective and informative. In this perverse day and age, and coming from a likely Jewish author, Steinweis’ study is really quite good. I even recommended it to Kevin when it first came out

 

 

There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's mass media of news and entertainment.

Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home in America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It is the power that shapes and molds the mind of virtually every citizen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.

The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us what to think about that image. Essentially everything we know -- or think we know -- about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news magazine, our radio, or our television.

It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories from our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing of history-distorting TV "docudramas" that characterizes the opinion-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in their management of the news and the entertainment that they present to us.

For example, the way in which the news is covered: which items are emphasized and which are played down; the reporter's choice of words, tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines; the choice of illustrations -- all of these things subliminally and yet profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or hear.

On top of this, of course, the columnists and editors remove any remaining doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all. Employing carefully developed psychological techniques, they guide our thought and opinion so that we can be in tune with the "in" crowd, the "beautiful people," the "smart money." They let us know exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people and behavior by placing those people or that behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and having the other TV characters react in the Politically Correct way.

Molding American Minds

For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected, liked, and socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge" Black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual, or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the other hand, a White racist -- that is, any racially conscious White person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly darkening racial situation in America -- is portrayed, at best, as a despicable bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to all law-abiding citizens. The White racist "gun nut," in fact, has become a familiar stereotype on TV shows.

The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an unhealthy portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and reality only with difficulty, if at all. He responds to the televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has been replaced by the false reality of the TV environment, and it is to this false reality that his urge to conform responds. Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval of some ideas and actions through the TV characters for whom he is writing, and disapproval of others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward conformity with his own views.

And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news, whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but they establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion.

As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares suggest that the U.S. government is backing the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish conflict and that it served Jewish interests rather than American interests to send U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel's principal rival in the Middle East. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.

Another example is the media treatment of racial issues in the United States. Some commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting news of racial strife, while others are emotionally partisan -- with the partisanship always on the non-White side. All of the media spokesmen without exception, however, take the position that "multiculturalism" and racial mixing are here to stay, and that they are good things.

Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who complains about "managed news" falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters -- and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media -- television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures -- speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people that might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters. They are presented with a single view of the world -- a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of non-White aliens pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep and bear arms, the moral equivalence of all sexual orientations, and the desirability of a "pluralistic," cosmopolitan society rather than a homogeneous one. It is a view of the world designed by the media masters to suit their own ends -- and the pressure to conform to that view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it, vote in accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it.

And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see, to a very large extent they are Jews. It isn't simply a matter of the media being controlled by profit-hungry capitalists, some of whom happen to be Jews. If that were the case, the ethnicity of the media masters would reflect, at least approximately, the ratio of rich Gentiles to rich Jews. The preponderance of Jews in the media is so overwhelming, however, that we are obliged to assume that it is due to more than mere happenstance.

Electronic News & Entertainment Media

Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry has resulted, not in the touted increased competition, but rather in an accelerating wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates. The largest of these conglomerates are rapidly growing even bigger by consuming their competition, almost tripling in size during the 1990s. Whenever you watch television, whether from a local broadcasting station or via a cable or a satellite dish; whenever you see a feature film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or to recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine -- it is very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was produced and/or distributed by one of these megamedia companies.

The largest media conglomerate today is AOL-Time Warner, created when AOL bought Time Warner for $160 billion in 2000. The merger brought together Steve Case, a Gentile, as chairman of AOL-TW, and Time Warner chairman Gerald Levin, a Jew, as the CEO. Although AOL-TW isn't (yet) run entirely by Jews, the effect of this blend of leadership between a White capitalist whose biggest concern is money and a racially conscious Jew will be gradually to increase the Jewish influence within AOL. Steve Case won't complain when Gerald Levin begins hiring mostly Jews to fill key positions beneath him because Case's own profits won't be affected. After Case dies or retires, the Jews will have complete control at AOL.

Before the merger, AOL was the largest Internet service provider in America, and it will now be used as an online platform for the Jewish content from Time Warner.

Time Warner, Inc., with 1997 revenues of more than $13 billion, was the second largest of the international media leviathans when it was bought by AOL. Levin, chairman and CEO of Time Warner, had bought Turner Broadcasting Systems in 1996 from Ted Turner, who had been one of the few Gentile entrepreneurs in the media business. Ted Turner, as the company president, became the number three man at AOL-TW, after Case and Levin.

When Ted Turner, the Gentile media maverick, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner had made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN, with over 70 million subscribers. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews.

To block Turner's bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a "friendly" takeover of the company, and from 1986 until 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network were obstructed by Levin's Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. When his fellow Jew Sumner Redstone offered to buy CBS for $34.8 billion in 1999, Levin had no objection.

Thus, despite being an innovator and garnering headlines, Turner never commanded the "connections" necessary for being a true media master. He finally decided if you can't lick 'em, join 'em, and he sold out to Levin. Ted Turner is in one respect a reflection of Steve Case. Both of these White men are capitalists with no discernible degree of racial consciousness or responsibility. In July 2001, AOL Time Warner announced that yet another Jew, Walter Isaacson, formerly the editorial director of Time, Inc., will become the new chairman and CEO of CNN News Group, which oversees the news empire that Ted Turner built.

Time Warner's subsidiary HBO is the country's largest pay-TV cable network. Until the purchase in May 1998 of PolyGram by Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Warner Music was America's largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records. Warner Music was an early promoter of "gangsta rap." Through its involvement with Interscope Records (prior to Interscope's acquisition by MCA), it helped to popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites.

In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio, Castle Rock Entertainment, and New Line Cinema) and in publishing. Time Warner's publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune).

The second-largest media conglomerate today, with 1997 revenues of $23 billion, is the Walt Disney Company. Its chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as "a control freak," includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television) and cable networks with more than 100 million subscribers altogether.

As for feature films, the Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group, under Walt Disney Studios, headed by Joseph E. Roth (also a Jew), includes Walt Disney Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Roth founded Caravan Pictures in January 1993, and it is now headed by his fellow Jew Roger Birnbaum. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers, Bob and Harvey, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies as The Crying Game, Priest, and Kids.

When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family, prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, the company under Eisner has expanded into the production of a great deal of so-called "adult" material.

In August 1995, Eisner acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., which owns the ABC Television Network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies.

ABC's cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, who is a Jew. The corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and A & E Television Networks cable companies, with 67 million subscribers each. ABC Radio Network owns 26 AM and FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, and Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates.

Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1997. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications (Women's Wear Daily), Chilton Publications (automotive manuals), and the Diversified Publishing Group.

Number three on the list, with 1997 revenues of just over $13 billion, is Viacom, Inc., headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein). Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 13 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Redstone acquired CBS following the December 1999 stockholders' votes at CBS and Viacom.

Working for Redstone as CBS's chief executive is a Jew named Melvin A. Karmazin. He is the boss and biggest individual shareholder of the company that owns the CBS Television Network, 14 major-market TV stations, 160 radio stations, the Country Music Television and the Nashville Network cable channels, and a large number of outdoor advertising assets.

Viacom's publishing division includes Simon & Schuster, Scribner, The Free Press, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks, and video games.

Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is as the world's largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989 MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television audience. The first quarter of 2001 was the 16th consecutive quarter in which MTV was rated as the #1 cable network for viewers between the ages of 12 and 24. Redstone, who actually owns 76 per cent of the shares of Viacom, has offered Beavis and Butthead as teen role models and currently is the largest single purveyor of race-mixing propaganda to White teenagers and sub-teens in America and in Europe. MTV Networks plans to acquire The Music Factory (TMF) from the Dutch media and marketing group Wegener. TMF distributes music to almost 10 million homes in Holland and Belgium. MTV is expanding its presence in Europe through new channels, including MTV Dance (Britain) and MTV Live (Scandinavia). MTV Italy is active through Cecchi Gori Communications. MTV pumps its racially mixed rock and rap videos into 210 million homes in 71 countries and is the dominant cultural influence on White teenagers around the world.

Nickelodeon, with about 65 million subscribers, has by far the largest share of the four-to-11-year-old TV audience in America and also is expanding rapidly into Europe. Most of its shows do not yet display the blatant degeneracy that is MTV's trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to his kiddie viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV. As of early 2001, Nickelodeon was continuing a nine-year streak as the top cable network for children and younger teenagers.

Another Jewish media mogul is Edgar Bronfman, Jr. He headed Seagram Company, Ltd., the liquor giant, until its recent merger with Vivendi. His father, Edgar Bronfman, Sr., is president of the World Jewish Congress. Seagram owned Universal Studios and Interscope Records, the foremost promoter of "gangsta rap." These companies now belong to Vivendi Universal.

Bronfman became the biggest man in the record business in May 1998 when he also acquired control of PolyGram, the European record giant, by paying $10.6 billion to the Dutch electronics manufacturer Philips. With the revenue from PolyGram added to that from MCA and Universal, Bronfman became master of the fourth largest media empire, with annual revenues around $12 billion. One especially unfortunate aspect of the PolyGram acquisition was that it gave Bronfman control of the world's largest producer of classical music CDs: PolyGram owns the Deutsche Grammophon, Decca-London, and Philips record companies.

In June 2000, the Bronfman family sold Seagram to Vivendi, a French utilities company led by gentile Jean-Marie Messier. The combined company, Vivendi Universal, will retain Edgar Bronfman, Jr., as the vice chairman of the new company, and he will continue to be in charge of its entertainment division. The strategy for this merger seems to mirror that of AOL-Time Warner: infect and wait. Vivendi Universal will pay off the debts it assumed in the merger by selling Seagram's alcohol business, retaining its media empire.

With two of the top four media conglomerates in the hands of Jews, and with Jews in executive charge of the remaining two, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on their part.

What about the other big media companies?

Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, which owns Fox Television Network, 20th Century Fox Films, and Fox 2000, is the fifth largest megamedia corporation in the country, with 1997 revenues of over $11 billion. It is the only other media company that comes even close to the top four. Murdoch is a Gentile Australian, but Peter Chernin, who is president and CEO of Fox Group, which includes all of News Corporation's film, television, and publishing operations in the United States, is a Jew. Under Chernin, as president of 20th Century Fox, is Laura Ziskin, a Jewess who formerly headed Fox 2000. Jew Peter Roth works under Chernin as president of Fox Entertainment. News Corporation also owns the New York Post and TV Guide, and they are published under Chernin's supervision. Murdoch told Newsweek magazine (July 12, 1999) that he would probably elevate Chernin to CEO of News Corporation, rather than allow the company to fall into the hands of his own children, none of whom are younger than their late twenties. It is hard to imagine a Jew giving a major media corporation to a Gentile underling when he has children waiting in the wings. For his part, Chernin was quite candid: "I get to control movies seen all over the world. . . . What could be more fun?"

Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as "the premier independent TV program producer in the United States," is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew who also owns Revlon cosmetics and who offered a job to Monica Lewinsky when Bill Clinton was trying to keep her quiet.

The best known of the smaller media companies, DreamWorks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. DreamWorks was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Considering the cash and connections that Geffen, Katzenberg, and Spielberg have, DreamWorks may soon be in the same league as the big four.

It is well known that Jews have controlled most of the production and distribution of films since shortly after the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century. When Walt Disney died in 1966, the last barrier to the total Jewish domination of Hollywood was gone, and Jews were able to grab ownership of the company that Walt built. Since then they have had everything their way in the movie industry.

Films produced by just the four largest motion picture companies mentioned above -- Disney, Warner Brothers, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram) -- accounted for two-thirds of the total box-office receipts for the year 1997.

The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson; NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert; and CBS first by William Paley and then by Laurence Tisch. Over periods of several decades these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong.

NBC provides a good example of this. The executives at NBC recently were shuffled among the key positions. Andrew Lack, who had been chief of the network's news division, ascended to become its president and chief operations officer. Neal Shapiro, who had been producing Dateline NBC, moved into Lack's old job. Jeff Zucker, who had been producing the Today show, was promoted to NBC entertainment president (a job that apparently was created for him), and Jonathan Wald moved into Zucker's old spot after shoving aside Michael Bass, who had been filling in for Zucker with Today. Some time ago, Wald became the producer of the NBC Nightly News, taking the position from Jeff Gralnick. When Wald moved to Today, Steve Capus took over as Tom Brokaw's producer. It is not known at this time whether Capus is a Jew or not, but everyone else is.

A similar preponderance of Jews exists in the news divisions of the other networks. For example, in February 2000, Al Ortiz moved to head the "Special Events" coverage at CBS, making gentile Jim Murphy the executive producer of The CBS Evening News with Dan Rather -- and the only exception that we know of to an otherwise solidly Jewish cadre of television news producers. The new CBS Early Show, which replaced CBS This Morning, had an internal shakeup in which three producers were fired, ostensibly for not being "aggressive" enough. One wonders whether they were also not Jewish enough. The shakeup did not, however, affect the outgoing executive producer Al Berman, who transferred to a new job as a program developer, and Steve Friedman has become the executive producer of the Early Show.

Paul Friedman is still the executive producer of ABC World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. Rick Kaplan, once an executive at ABC, moved to CNN in 1997, where he became the president of CNN/USA.

The Print Media

After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1483 different publications (this figure is for February 2000). One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of majority interests than a casual observer would think.

In 1945, four out of five American newspapers were independently owned and published by local people with close ties to their communities. Those days, however, are gone. Most of the independent newspapers were bought out or driven out of business by the mid-1970s. Today most "local" newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or even thousands of miles away. Today less than 20 percent of the country's 1483 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only 104 of the total number have circulations of more than 100,000. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest must depend on these few for all of their national and international news.

The Associated Press, which sells content to newspapers, is currently under the control of its Jewish managing editor, Michael Silverman, who directs the day-to-day news reporting and supervises the editorial departments. Silverman had directed the AP's national news as assistant managing editor since 1992. He was promoted to his current job in 2000. Silverman reports to Jonathan Wolman, also a Jew, who is executive editor for the AP.

In only 47 cities in America are there more than one daily newspaper, and competition is frequently nominal even among them, as between morning and afternoon editions under the same ownership. Examples of this are the Mobile, Alabama, morning Register and afternoon Press-Register; and the Syracuse, New York, morning Post-Standard and afternoon Herald-Journal -- all owned by the Jewish Newhouse brothers through their holding company, Advance Publications.

The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 30 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the country's largest cable networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group.

This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at the age of 84, he bequeathed media holdings worth an estimated $1.3 billion to his two sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of further acquisitions, the net worth of Advance Publications has grown to more than $8 billion today.

The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It is advertising revenue -- not the small change collected from a newspaper's readers -- that largely pays the editor's salary and yields the owner's profit.

Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of the last century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers -- primarily as a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants.

Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America's newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation's three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three, dominating America's financial and political capitals, are the newspapers that set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones that decide what is news and what isn't, at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands.

The New York Times, with a September 1999 circulation of 1,086,000, is the unofficial social, fashion, entertainment, political, and cultural guide of the nation. It tells America's "smart set" which books to buy and which films to see; which opinions are in style at the moment; which politicians, educators, spiritual leaders, artists, and businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in the 19th century it was a genuinely American newspaper.

The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry J. Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones's estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-great-grandson, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current publisher and the chairman of the New York Times Co. The executive editor is Joseph Lelyveld, also a Jew (he is a rabbi's son).

The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June 1993 for $1.1 billion; twelve magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.

Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its "leaks" throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government.

The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John R. McLean, and later inherited by Edward B. McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former partner of the infamous Bernard Baruch, industry czar in America during the First World War.

The Washington Post is now run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer's daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979 she appointed her son Donald publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. The newspaper has a daily circulation of 763,000, and its Sunday edition sells 1.1 million copies.

The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers (the Gazette Newspapers, including 11 military publications); in television (WDIV in Detroit, KPRC in Houston, WPLG in Miami, WKMG in Orlando, KSAT in San Antonio, WJXT in Jacksonville); and in magazines, most notably the nation's number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. The Washington Post Company's various television ventures reach a total of about 7 million homes, and its cable TV service, Cable One, has 635,000 subscribers.

In a joint venture with the New York Times, the Post publishes the International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed English-language daily in the world.

The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation's largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation that also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron's, among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R. Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal.

Most of New York's other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 1993 the New York Daily News was bought from the estate of the late Jewish media mogul Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm. And, as mentioned above, the New York Post is owned by News Corporation under the Jew Peter Chernin.

News Magazines

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, films, music, and newspapers. Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any importance published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report.

Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a subsidiary of Time Warner Communications, the new media conglomerate formed by the 1989 merger of Time, Inc., with Warner Communications. The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald Levin, a Jew.

Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.1 million.

U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.2 million, is owned and published by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman, who also has taken the position of editor-in-chief of the magazine for himself. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York's tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the country.

Our Responsibility

Those are the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of yearbooks on the radio and television industries and into directories of newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify their accuracy. They are undeniable, and when confronted with them Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner isn't a Jew!" they will announce triumphantly, as if that settled the issue. If pressed further they will accuse the confronter of "anti-Semitism" for even raising the subject. It is fear of this accusation that keeps many persons who know the facts silent.

But we must not remain silent on this most important of issues! The Jewish control of the American mass media is the single most important fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole world today. There is nothing -- plague, famine, economic collapse, even nuclear war -- more dangerous to the future of our people.

Jewish media control determines the foreign policy of the United States and permits Jewish interests rather than American interests to decide questions of war and peace. Without Jewish media control, there would have been no Persian Gulf war, for example. There would have been no NATO massacre of Serb civilians. There would be no continued beating of the drums for another war against Iraq.

By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by parents, schools, or any other influence.

The Jew-controlled entertainment media have taken the lead in persuading a whole generation that homosexuality is a normal and acceptable way of life; that there is nothing at all wrong with White women dating or marrying Black men, or with White men marrying Asian women; that all races are inherently equal in ability and character -- except that the character of the White race is suspect because of a history of oppressing other races; and that any effort by Whites at racial self-preservation is reprehensible.

We must oppose the further spreading of this poison among our people, and we must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority, with values and interests different from our own. But to permit the Jews, with their 3,000-year history of nation-wrecking, from ancient Egypt to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to race suicide. Indeed, the fact that so many White Americans today are so filled with a sense of racial guilt and self-hatred that they actively seek the death of their own race is a deliberate consequence of Jewish media control.

Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control, it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to break that control. We must shrink from nothing in combating this evil power that has fastened its deadly grip on our people and is injecting its lethal poison into their minds and souls. If we fail to destroy it, it certainly will destroy our race.

Let us begin now to acquire knowledge and to take action toward this necessary end.

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=1702