go home White

White Politics: The State of the Movement Mid-2001

Alex Linder

Background: I've just read Kevin MacDonald's Separation and Its Discontents, the second of his trilogy, the one treating anti-Semitism as a natural reaction to Jewish evolutionary strategy. The other day I listened to speeches by Sam Francis and a couple others at the 2000 American Renaissance conference. What follows is an article laying out where we are today and measuring our tactics and strategies against the most relevant historical parallel.

* * *

Where we are today...

White Americans more or less understand racial reality, but not political reality. Most of them still vaguely think the Republicans are “conservative” (they aren't) and that they defend the White man (they don't). Like the Dems, the Reps are wholly in thrall to Jewish money and ideology. They “reach out” to every minority under the sun including queers, but try as they might, they just can't find room for pro-Whites. They understand that to fight on the real issues -- race and Jews -- is political suicide. They've accepted that, and altered their positions (those eternal principles they swear by!) accordingly.

Mass voters can hardly make any distinction at all beyond the gross right/left one set out for us by the Establishment and its controlled media. As Sam Francis mentioned at AmRen 2000, Buchanan told him that one of the commonest things people said to him back when he first ran was that they were drooling over a Buchanan-Kemp ticket -- a ticket of polar opposites, that is. This suggests that the American public can't make out any difference finer than that between a whale and a snail; that essentially it's as superficial as a bunch of giggling high school girls pairing up couples on the basis of looks. Whether stupid or merely perceptively-challenged, the American public can't make distinctions and so will always fall victim to plausible misrepresentations. This means that political control devolves upon those who present the candidates. This means that, as the Russian Jewish media mogul put it: Media is politics. Who controls the media? We all know the answer to that one. But who will say it?...

Racialists dim too...

This political dimness exists among racialists too.

In the same way that the general public has yet to understand the true politics of the Republicans, which are far from stupid (Sam Francis to the contrary, they are stupid only if we accept their claimed aims as their real aims -- which makes us the stupid party), the racialist right itself is far from a quick study. I was astonished to hear Sam Francis say, in response to an audience member's question, that he and Pat Buchanan had never really discussed race. He just didn't think (and he is correct) that Buchanan's thoughts or interests lay in that direction. Still, you might have thought that in the, what?, thirty years of their acquaintance, the topic might have come up at least once!

Today, after years of denseness that not even his partnership with Fulani and the colored high-school teacher could pierce, most racialists are finally hip to the fact that Buchanan indeed is not one of us. He is a Catholic, and he cares more about the souls of the 70-IQ black underclass that rapes and murders us (on our dime) than our vision of White America. Catholics who take it seriously are like that. Do you understand the full import of Francis' remark, White man? Here you are imagining your betters have their heads together plotting the Revenge of the Civilized White Man, but the fact is, two of the top brains on our side have NEVER EVEN DISCUSSED THE MATTER PRIVATELY! Wow... We really are all alone. But WE ALONE is the English meaning of Sinn Fein, which apparently achieved its aims with a mere 200 hard-core activists. Something to ponder.

Fact is, Pat Buchanan has not changed; we have simply never looked at him unfoggedly. We accepted that because the media lie about him and misrepresent him as a nazi-racist, he must be one of us. Now we know he isn't. The lesson is that we must be very, very careful to make sure we know who's really on our side and who isn't. Let's not let this happen again, ok? The way to do that is to eschew codes. We don't want to hear any more about what someone REALLY believes. That garbage is old, it's yesterday, it doesn't work, it's done and gone. We'll leave the wink-and-nodding to the lying dyslexics like, gee, I don't know, Bushy and Bushy Jr. Ok? Nobody who doesn't speak plainly and declare his hostility to the Jew and his advocacy of White nationalism should be listened to. That doesn't mean we STILL can't be lied to and misled, but it does make it more difficult.

Beyond the elementary need to identify the teams lies a deeper problem of communication. The left is fond of citing “poor communication” where the real problem is clashing interests, but communication really is the problem on the right these days. We don't control the media, we can't even get a word in edgewise. We are continually demonized, and for the half of us with a conciliatory temperament (for want of a better way to describe it) this means always trying to scurry away from whatever label the Jews are trying to stick us with. Protesting our moral bona fides like so many Republicans and never getting around to the attack.

This labeling has ramifications beyond the obvious. We are mischaracterized and demonized with labels to the point where all of “our” public representatives run from us, or, if they are us (David Duke, for example), themselves play the media game to the extent of attempting to forswear “hatred” and eschew slurs such as 'nigger.' It all becomes a turbid welter about as quickly as disturbed pondwater. Nobody knows what anybody truly is, what anybody truly believes, because nobody will speak openly and publicly. They all think they “can't” speak what they truly believe. So they hedge, or they speak in code. Except -- see the Republicans -- they either aren't talking in code, or, if they are, after a time they believe their own bullshit. “The fool you flatter may be the fool you become,” as the adage goes. Everybody speaks in code or really believes the libspeak he mouths or is headed that way; same thing for everybody else trying to understand him. We are all speaking dishonestly while our minds scurry to suss out deeper meanings. Is it any surprise we are perpetually confused, and most of the time wrong in our guesses and interpretations?... How could it be otherwise? Isn't it obvious that this confusion and disgust are one of the richest harvests reaped by the libs from their incesssant, inevitable and inescapable labeling? How long do we keep playing by their rules? To play by their rules is to pretend the game isn't rigged. And that is a sure recipe for failure. The pro-White right has yet to record a single victory -- in this country.

The Germans who found themselves in a similar position made anti-Semitism one of four or five tines on their political pitchfork. Are you listening, Jared Taylor? And neither did they shrink from caricatures and slurs as we are advised by David Duke. Would you concede – consider?, messrs Duke and Taylor, that the Germans had a better political grasp than you? That they succeeded where you have failed?

So far we've been talking about the actors: the players, the pols, the pundits. On the other side we have the average guy working eight, ten hours a day, dealing with his family, and in a few cadged minutes before he hits the sack trying to figure out who is who and what is what. How in the world is he supposed to shift through the b.s. to figure out what X really believes? He can't. The only people who could are those with brains and leisure. He might have the brains, but the only people with the leisure are those sponging off his work through the welfare state created by the Jews the people he thinks are on his side are too scared to name. It's a rotten Jewish system, and pussyfooting ensures it will grow rottener. Calling things by their real names is the place to start. Am I wrong?

The time grows late...

Friends -- to make blunt -- we are screwed. The only way to go is to speak in hammer-tones what we believe: White is right, Jews are the disease, and we will battle them unto the death. As far as I can tell, William Pierce and the National Alliance -- of which I am a member -- are the only people playing straight. You cannot listen to Pierce or any NA member and not understand who we are and what we believe. That certainly can't be said of the Republicans, but it is equally true that it can't be said of the American Renaissance crowd either. And the people -- some of them -- are crying for leadership! You can see it plain as day: Who do we turn to, asked a guy from Kansas, to help us do what we all know needs to be done? No answer given. Speaking in code words, hiring Jewish keynoters, and crossing fingers to get asked back to Queen Latifah won't get the job done, Mr. Taylor. But if you want more of that, keep on subsidizing Mr. Taylor, Kansas.

I didn't hear the word Jew spoken once in any of the two or three addresses I heard via realplayer. Not once. What I did hear was the courtly Taylor speaking about the high price paid by folks for speaking the truth. He mentioned four: Sam Francis, Joe Sobran, Scott McConnell, and Peter Brimelow. Of these four, Sobran is the only one I believe has written publicly what he knows to be the truth about Jews. The others are trimmers, and though they may have every personal reason in the world, the fact is they are still drawing paychecks for writing about politics while withholding the vital truth. That's malpractice any way you slice it. If you are paid to write on a subject -- a vital subject -- and you withhold relevant information, and you collect money for your words, then you are doing something ignoble and worthy of the disgust of civilized men. That may seem harsh these days, but from the longer perspective, it is the correct judgment. You reading my words know that I am correct. All that is necessary for Jews to triumph is for White men to do nothing. But sit there. And draw pay. And round-pat themselves for courage.

Sam Francis writes about Middle American Revolutionaries and East Coast elites. Scott McConnell is a comparatively minor figure but still instructive: Jews at the New York Post got rid of him for a couple milquetoast observations about fat, squalid Puerto Ricans and their filthy parade, but if he's ever written a word critical of the self-chosens who dumped him, well, I haven't seen it. Brimelow is like Taylor: a nice man who has written an excellent book, but one in which he avoids mentioning the deep cause of the symptoms he describes. Scratch a right-wing writer, find a symptomatician. We need diagnosticians and curers. We need people who will tell us in plain language what the disease is -- Jew -- and how to effect the cure.

These guys have their role to play, but until they decide to do more than hint, they aren't worth much of our time. Sam Francis in his speech quite rightly points out that the right cedes “moral legitimacy” and cultural dominance to the left, effectively losing the game before it starts. But he himself is part of the problem. What is his term 'Middle American Revolutionaries' if not a cultural and moral concession that there is something wrong with defending Whites and White culture openly? Truly, a euphemism fit for a revolution squeezed out of those obese women stuffing teddy bears in chain-link fences down in Oklahoma. And then to hear from Taylor how much Francis has suffered for his boldness, fired from the August position of staff editorial writer at the Washington Times by crotchless-panty-wearing he-man Wesley Prudence! Wake up, Jared Taylor! Many aren't getting paid, and many are going farther than you and Francis dare. Not that you'll even link to openly racist sites -- too busy pumping neocon anti-racial dogmatist Horowitz' path of seduction, frontpagemag.com, even as he blasts you on same! Why do you feed the mouth that bites you, Mr. Taylor?

Why? Ah, the bitter ironies multiply, don't they! Mr. Taylor would effect a revolution by remonstrating rationally amidst a sea of sooty subjects of a self-styled queen; by promoting the colorblind lies of a neocon Jew. Where does that path lead, Mr. Taylor? You are becoming a seducer, like the seducers you flatter.

We are in a truly vicious fight, a war waged by enemies intent on winning by any means, and a war they are winning, while Taylor and Francis and anybody else in public getting paid not only refrain from criticizing Jews but hire them (!), and encourage us to follow in their “respectability.” So Buckley kicked out all the "anti-Semites" and conspiracy-seers to make the right respectable enough to knock gingerly on the libs' cocktail party door. What irony. What do you call Mr. Taylor's approach if not ceding moral legitimacy and cultural dominance to the left by inviting, nay, highlighting Jews at his conference? How is there a dime's worth of difference between Buckley weeding the pro-Whites and Taylor carefully downplaying any criticism of Jews while inviting them in to make liberal hash of racialism the same way they disoriented and denatured conservatism? Your timid, pro-Semitic, pay-stub racialism isn't getting the job done. It's time for you to get out of the way.

I'll say it again: No-Jews-Allowed-Pro-White Politics -- open, shameless, aggressive Whites First, Last and Only advocacy -- is the only political route with ANY chance of success. We must demonize the Jews with facts the way they demonize us with lies, and build White team spirit to the point we can reclaim the country. There is no other way.

Fat and feckless...

Whites right now lack the fighting desperation necessary to create a revolution. You can see this in the faces and body language and attitudes of the would-be revolutionaries. The age-old flaws are everywhere you turn. Every man-jack's alone in his prickly igloo of cactus spines, ensconced in his self-love, wrapt warmly in his fleecy opinion. Nobody truly feels threatened, nobody's willing to cede an inch. We are a long, long way from any physical revolution, you can bank on that. Well-fed people don't rock the boat. What was it Shakespeare said about lean and hungry men?

Right now the best that is being done is being done by the National Alliance, which is openly hostile to the Jews that hate us. The NA does real work, distributing literature, making videos, making weekly radio addresses, physically hitting the street, pressing the flesh, talking to the people, making converts. Its leaders live low off the hog and have gone a very long way, through their book offerings, to preserving a solid curriculum by which you can educate yourself and your children in the ways of our ancestors, our culture, our nation. Each week Pierce attacks the Jews the way they attack us each minute on their tv. Can any other rightist or racialist say the same? I do not demand that everybody agree on every position. What I do demand is that every one of you public leaders out there who knows that the things we say about Jews are true but refuses to mention them out of fear rediscover his manhood and join sides with the truth -- the winning side. If a mild man like Joe Sobran can do that, you can too.

The order of the day -- as is abundantly clear from MacDonald's work -- is that we have to create an in-group consciousness to rival the Jews'. We need team spirit, team unity and team effort. But we can't get that when our “leaders” refuse to call a spade a spade. I mean, what is a “Middle American Revolutionary”? Why would I want to join a revolution where the “leaders” are fat and fearful and dream up ridiculous circumlocutions for the thing they're supposedly fighting to protect? Why should we listen to people who criticize their betters and former bosses for ceding moral legitimacy to the people they themselves are afraid to name, let alone attack? We may not be able to control what the Jews behind the media label us, nor the smears they stick us with, but we can control what we call ourselves, and we can define the enemy we engage. We are White, and the enemy is the Jew. The rest is so much temporizing, paycheck-sniffing, self-patting garbage.

You guys would be surprised how easy it is to be free. Try it.



Rudyard Kipling photo
Rudyard Kipling
The Beginning (1914-18)

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late
With long arrears to make good,
When the English began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy-willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the English began to hate.

Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show,
When the English began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.

It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate,
Through the chill years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the English began to hate.

Rudyard Kipling